Getting Lost Without Losing the Way
Design as a Practice of Conjunction Inside and Outside Artificial Worlds
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.82068/pgjournal.2026.23.43.09Keywords:
Generative Artificial Intelligence, Design Pedagogy, Designer Agency, Embodied Knowledge, Digital ArtisansAbstract
Generative artificial intelligence technologies are redefining the processes of visual communication design, shortening production times and lowering the threshold of access to design tools. If the quality of a project does not depend on the precision of the prompt that generated it, but rather on its capacity to open up spaces of exploration, what remains of the designer's agency in the age of AI? This contribution addresses this question by drawing on the distinction, proposed by the philosopher Franco Berardi, between connection – a contact that optimizes signals without inhabiting the distance between producer and receiver – and conjunction, the framework of intentional acts within which alternative ways of thinking are generated. Generative AI presents itself as a technology of connection: it shortens the design process by eliminating the friction that has historically made design a form of embodied exploration. The article proposes a reading of visual design as a practice of conjunction: a space in which aesthetic experience generates unpredictable relations, disorientation, and the shared construction of meaning. The paper examines some pedagogical and design practices – from the exercises of Tenazas and Reinfurt to contemporary productions such as the BBC campaign Let's Make It Iconic and Donato Sansone's Concatenation 2 - Olympic Games – in which the resistance of materials and the suspension of immediacy prove to be fertile conditions rather than obstacles to be removed. These offer a productive lens through which to view the designer as a cultural nomad, capable of getting lost without losing themselves: pursuing opportunities for deviation and error, and welcoming unforeseen interpretations, without ever relinquishing critical direction. To validate this posture does not mean opposing one tool to another, but rather reaffirming design as a practice capable of inhabiting uncertainty and transforming it into transmissible knowledge: an agency that no automated system can assume in its place.
References
Bateson, G. (1977). Verso un'ecologia della mente (G. Longo & G. Trautteur, Trans.). Adelphi.
Baumeister, R. F., Bibby, M. T., Tice, D. M., & Bushman, B. J. (2026). Socializing while alone: Loss of impact and engagement when interacting remotely via technology. Perspectives on Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916251404368
Berardi, F. (2021). E: La congiunzione. Fenomenologia della fine. Nero Edizioni.
Colamedici, A. (2025). L'algoritmo di Babele: Storie e miti dell'intelligenza artificiale. Tlon.
Corbin, H. (1964). Mundus imaginalis ou l'imaginaire et l'imaginal, in «Cahiers internationaux de symbolisme 6», Société de symbolisme, Brussels, pp. 3-26.
Floridi, L. (2022). Etica dell'intelligenza artificiale: Sviluppi, opportunità, sfide. Raffaello Cortina.
Floridi, L., & Durante, M. (2025). La differenza fondamentale. Artificial agency: Una nuova filosofia dell'intelligenza artificiale. Mondadori.
Gancitano, M. (2026). Animali narrativi. Perché non possiamo smettere di credere alle storie. Marsilio.
Huyskes, D. (2024). Tecnologia della rivoluzione. Feltrinelli.
Leone XIV. (2026). Magnifica Humanitas. Libreria Editrice Vaticana.
Lerner, F. (2005). Foundations for design education: Continuing the Bauhaus Vorkurs vision. Studies in Art Education, 46(3), 211–226.
Munari, B. (1981), Da cosa nasce cosa: appunti per una metodologia progettuale. Bari: Laterza [ristampa 2011].
Reinfurt, D. (2020). A new program for graphic design. Inventory Press / Distributed Art Publishers.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Progetto Grafico Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.