CREATIVITY AND CULTURE IN THE AGE OF GENERATIVE AI
THE ROLE OF CULTURAL SPECIFICITY IN THE DESIGN OF AI!GENERATED CONTENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.82068/pgjournal.2025.22.41.13Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Prompt design, Generative AI, Language, Human-AI interactionAbstract
The paper explores the relationship between language, culture, and generative artificial intelligence through a qualitative comparison of multilingual text-to-image models. Starting from three literary passages originally written in English, Italian, and Chinese, a trial was designed in order to analyze the impact of the user's native language on the production of visual content through AI software, as well as the impact of the language with which the latter were trained. The texts were transformed into prompts using different linguistic systems, and the generated images were then compared based on qualitative criteria.
The study takes an exploratory approach and focuses on aspects such as semantic rendering, stylistic consistency, and the presence of implicit or explicit cultural elements. The aim is to explore the possibility that generative AI is not a neutral tool destined to culturally flatten the content generated in the future, but that it may instead reflect, or distort, the cognitive and symbolic specificities linked to the language and culture with which it interacts.
References
Arcodia, G. F., & Basciano, B. (2018). The construction morphology analysis of Chinese word formation. In The construction of words: Advances in Construction Morphology (pp. 219–253).
Barthes, R. (1977). Image–music–text. Fontana Press.
Boroditsky, L. (2011). How language shapes thought. Scientific American, 304(2), 62–65. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26002395
Burlando, F., Chen, B., & Casiddu, N. (2025). Dataset for the “Creativity and culture in the age of generative AI. The role of cultural specificity in the design of AI-generated content” paper [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15761085
Campbell, L. (2018). How many language families are there in the world? Anuario del Seminario de Filología Vasca “Julio de Urquijo”, 52(1–2), 133–152. https://doi.org/10.1387/asju.20195
Comrie, B. (1989). Language universals and linguistic typology: Syntax and morphology. University of Chicago Press.
DeFrancis, J. (1989). Visible speech: The diverse oneness of writing systems. University of Hawaii Press.
Emily, B. (1847). Wuthering Heights. Thomas Cautley Newby.
Everett, C. (2023). A myriad of tongues: How languages reveal differences in how we think. Harvard University Press.
Gombrich, E. H., Hochberg, J., Black, M., & Fontana, L. (2002). Arte, percezione e realtà. Come pensiamo le immagini. Einaudi.
Harari, Y. N. (2015). Homo Deus: A brief history of tomorrow. Ballantine Books.
Itten, J. (1961). The art of color: The subjective experience and objective rationale of color. Wiley.
Jiang, Q., Gao, Z., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2025). DeepSeek vs. ChatGPT vs. Claude: A comparative study for scientific computing and scientific machine learning tasks. Theoretical and Applied Mechanics Letters, 15(3), 100583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taml.2025.100583
Kay, P., & Regier, T. (2006). Language, thought and color: Recent developments. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(2), 51–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.12.007
Lindsey, J., Gurnee, W., Ameisen, E., Chen, B., Pearce, A., Turner, & Batson, J. (2025). On the biology of a large language model. Transformer Circuits Thread.
Rizzolatti, G., & Sinigaglia, C. (2006). So quel che fai: Il cervello che agisce e i neuroni specchio. Cortina.
Schulhoff, S., Ilie, M., Balepur, N., Kahadze, K., Liu, A., Si, & Resnik, P. (2024). The prompt report: A systematic survey of prompting techniques. arXiv:2406.06608.
Tan, S. (ca. 1896). Lao Tan you ji [Travels of Old Tan]. Jiangnan Shuju.
Tao, J., & Wong, J. (2019). The confounding Mandarin colour term “qīng”: Green, blue, black or all of the above and more? In Studies in ethnopragmatics, cultural semantics, and intercultural communication: Minimal English (and Beyond) (pp. 95–116). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9979-5_6
Ting, L. (2022). Towards a semiotics of Chinese characters. Signs and Media, 1(2), 111–141. https://doi.org/10.1163/25900323-12340017
Verga, G. (1881). I Malavoglia. Treves.
Wang, X., Wang, Y., & Qiu, X. (2025). How to talk to AI: The role of preset prompt language styles in shaping conversational experience. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 41(12), 7763–7778. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2400398
Whorf, B. L. (2012). Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. MIT Press.
Xie, P. (2023). Research on the aesthetic value and artistic characteristics in Chinese painting. Art and Performance Letters, 4, 51–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/artpl.2023.040410
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Progetto Grafico Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.