Relearning to See
Basic Design Pedagogy in the Age of Artificial Intelligence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.82068/pgjournal.2026.23.43.06Keywords:
Visual Design, Basic Pedagogy, Studio, Brief, MaterialityAbstract
The introduction of artificial intelligence is profoundly reshaping the ways in which visual design is practised, taught, and learned. While much of the contemporary debate focuses on the technological, operational, and occupational aspects of this transformation, less attention is devoted to its educational implications. Building on this premise, the paper examines the phenomenon from a historical and pedagogical perspective, taking as its point of reference the tradition of basic design pedagogy developed within Modernism and its subsequent developments. Through the analysis of three historically established categories – studio, brief, and materiality – the paper explores possible correspondences with the forms of interaction characteristic of contemporary artificial intelligence models. The three categories are examined through the work of key figures in visual design pedagogy and adopted as perspectives from which to observe the ways in which visual design has historically constructed and transmitted its disciplinary knowledge. Rather than establishing direct equivalences between historical pedagogy and generative systems, the paper aims to show how conceptual structures developed within the educational tradition of visual design can provide useful tools for critically understanding the transformations currently taking place.
References
Albers, J. (2010). Uno più uno uguale tre e anche di più: Fatti fattuali e fatti attuali. Il verri, 43, 24. (Opera originale pubblicata come Search versus research nel 1969). https://www.ilverri.it/magazine/4232/newbasic/
Armstrong, H. (2021). Big data, big design: Why designers should care about artificial intelligence. Princeton Architectural Press. https://www.ribabooks.com/big-data-big-design-why-designers-should-care-about-artificial-intelligence_9781616899158
Boucharenc, C. (2006). Research on basic design education: An international survey. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 16(1), pp. 1-30. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10798-005-2110-8
Daichendt, J. (2010). Artist-teacher: A philosophy for creating and teaching. Intellect Books. https://www.intellectbooks.com/artist-teacher
Droste, M., & Bauhaus-Archiv Museum für Gestaltung. (1990). Bauhaus, 1919–1933. Taschen. https://archive.org/details/bauhaus191919330000dros
Drucker, J. (2014). Graphesis: Visual forms of knowledge production. Harvard University Press. https://www.hup.harvard.edu/books/9780674724938
Findeli, A. (2001). Rethinking design education for the 21st century: Theoretical, methodological, and ethical discussion. Design Issues, 17(1), pp. 5-17. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1511905
Flusser, V. (1999). The shape of things: A philosophy of design. Reaktion Books. https://reaktionbooks.co.uk/work/the-shape-of-things
Frascara, J. (2004). Communication design: Principles, methods, and practice. Allworth Press. https://archive.org/details/communicationdes0000jorg
Rose, G., & Tolia-Kelly, D. P. (a cura di). (2016). Visuality/materiality: Images, objects and practices. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/VisualityMateriality-Images-Objects-and-Practices/Tolia-Kelly-Rose/p/book/9781138252516
Itten, J. (1963). Design and form: The basic course at the Bauhaus and later. John Wiley & Sons. https://archive.org/details/designformbas00itte
Kirkpatrick Diane, Time and Space in the Work of László Moholy-Nagy, in “Hungarian Studies Review”, vol. xv, n. 1, 1998, pp. 63-76. https://www.moholy-nagy.org/references/
Lupton, E., & Phillips, J. C. (2008). Graphic design: The new basics. Princeton Architectural Press; Maryland Institute College of Art. https://www.abebooks.it/9781616893323/Graphic-Design-New-Basics-Lupton-161689332X/plp
McLain, M. (2022). Towards a signature pedagogy for design and technology education: A literature review. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32(3), pp. 1629-1648. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10798-021-09667-5
McCormick, R. (1997). Conceptual and procedural knowledge. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 7(1-2), pp. 141-159. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1008819912213
Moholy-Nagy, L. (1945). Vision in motion. Paul Theobald. https://archive.org/details/visioninmotion00moho
Palm, N. (Ed.). (2017). Taking a line for a walk: Assignments in design education. Spector Books. https://www.spectorbooks.com/book/taking-a-line-for-a-walk
Perfido, A. (2022). Conversation designer: Progettare esperienze memorabili con l’AI conversazionale. FrancoAngeli. https://www.francoangeli.it/Libro/Conversation-Designer-Progettare-esperienze-memorabili-con-l%27AI-conversazionale?Id=27531
Sawyer, R. K. (2021). The iterative and improvisational nature of the creative process. Journal of Creativity, 31. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2713374521000029
Schön, D. A. (1985). The design studio: An exploration of its traditions and potentials. RIBA Publications. https://www.abebooks.co.uk/9780947877453/Design-Studio-Exploration-Traditions-Potential-0947877452/plp
Simonini, I. (2006). Storia del basic design. In G. Anceschi, M. Botta, & M. A. Garito (a cura di), L’ambiente dell’apprendimento: Web design e processi cognitivi (pp. 69-90). McGraw-Hill. https://www.abebooks.it/9788838663574/Lambiente-dellapprendimento-Web-design-processi-8838663572/plp
Somaini, A. (2023). Algorithmic images: Artificial intelligence and visual culture. Grey Room, 93, pp. 74-115. https://doi.org/10.1162/grey_a_00383
Stein, C. (2024). Digital materiality. Trayectorias Humanas Trascontinentales, 18. https://doi.org/10.25965/trahs.6416
Thellefsen, M., Dewi, A. N., & Sørensen, B. (2026). The meaning of prompts and the prompts of meaning: Semiotic reflections and modelling. Journal of Documentation. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-03-2026-0140
Triggs, T. (2011). Graphic design history: Past, present, and future. Design Issues, 27(1), pp. 3-6. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40983239
Verganti, R., Vendraminelli, L., & Iansiti, M. (2020). Innovation and design in the age of artificial intelligence. Journal of Product Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12523
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Progetto Grafico Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.